Legal dramas often portray climactic courtroom scenes where sharp lawyers unveil the truth and secure justice. In reality, many individuals lose their battles, not because they’re wrong, but because they lack the resources to fight against wealthier adversaries. This is where the AI revolution is poised to bridge the gap, bringing fairness and efficiency to legal systems worldwide.

Closing the Justice Gap

Artificial intelligence, one of the most transformative technologies of our time, is reshaping the legal landscape. From drafting contracts to analyzing complex evidence, AI is being embraced not only by global law firms but also by grassroots initiatives, like the Westway Trust’s Cost of Living Crisis Clinic in London.

This clinic, located in one of England’s most disadvantaged neighborhoods, assists clients with challenging issues such as benefits appeals and landlord disputes. For many, the legal aid available is insufficient, leaving them unable to challenge injustices they instinctively know to be wrong.

One client, displaced by a landlord’s decision to terminate her tenancy, shares her struggle:
“I’m a professional person, and I’m not used to being in this kind of situation. It’s distressing, destabilizing, and, at my age, being homeless is particularly difficult.”

AI as a Legal Ally

For individuals like her, accessing justice can be prohibitively expensive. Effective resolutions often require expert advice early on—something AI is making more accessible.

At the Westway Trust, paralegal adviser Adam Samji uses AI tools to analyze lengthy documents, such as 60-page benefit eligibility assessments, in a fraction of the time it would take manually.
“We spend a couple of minutes redacting personal information, upload the document, and the AI model processes it in 10 to 15 minutes,” explains Samji. “This efficiency allows us to better serve our clients.”

A Revolution in Progress

AI’s integration into legal workflows is already a game-changer. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and head of civil justice in England and Wales, sees immense potential:
“When claims remain unresolved, it creates significant economic and personal losses. AI can help us resolve disputes faster and at lower costs, enhancing productivity and well-being.”

AI isn’t just saving time—it’s transforming access to justice. Tools like Trialview analyze live courtroom transcripts, flagging inconsistencies in witness testimony and evidence, a task traditionally reserved for barristers and their support teams. According to Trialview’s founder, Stephen Dowling, these technologies could reduce the need for large legal teams:
“AI could enable one or two lawyers to do the work of 10 or 20, massively cutting costs and improving access to justice.”

Balancing Innovation and Oversight

However, this progress comes with challenges. In 2023, a New York court fined lawyers for submitting false arguments generated by ChatGPT. Errors and biases in AI systems trained on incomplete data remain a significant concern.

John Mahoney, a lawyer at Westway Trust, highlights the importance of human oversight:
“About one in 30 outputs from AI is inaccurate. We carefully review all AI-generated work related to legal opinions.”

Sir Geoffrey’s guidance ensures that judges and lawyers remain accountable for AI-assisted evidence. He emphasizes transparency and warns against relying on generic AI tools like ChatGPT for legal advice, as these tools may not account for jurisdictional differences or nuances in the law.

The Future of Justice

While “robo-judges” remain a distant concept, the legal system is poised for further technological evolution. Sir Geoffrey remains optimistic:
“The rule of law requires outcomes from an independent judiciary. AI will enhance our ability to provide these outcomes effectively for a growing population.”

By harnessing AI responsibly, the legal system can democratize access to justice, ensuring that more individuals can stand their ground in disputes, regardless of their financial means. The AI revolution isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about fairness.

Source